Socioeconomic effect of land grab on farming household (HH) heads in Delta Central Agricultural Zone, Delta State, Nigeria

Albert Ukaro Ofuoku, Ezekiel Eromed Oghene


The study examined socioeconomic effects of land grab on farming HH heads in Delta Central Agricultural Zone of Delta State, Nigeria. Ten percent (10%) of identified farming HH heads were involved in the study. Most (50.37%) of the respondents had farms of the sizes of between 0.10 and 1.99ha with a mean farm size of 2.4ha. Their mean farm income was N400, 000. Most (84.44%) of them were employed by the agricultural investors after their plots of land were grabbed; 52.59% had fair health status. Sizes of land grabbed from individual farmers ranged between 0.10 and 5.99ha. The lands grabbed were for plantation agricultural, and food crops production. Few of the land deals (24.44%) were sealed with the involvement of the farmers and the investors and the farmers were adequately compensated. The results of the hypothesis showed that land grab had negative effects on farming HH heads’ socio-economic variables of farm size, farm income, employment status, health status and social status. It was recommended that land deals should involve the investors, government, community leaders and the land holders.

Full Text:



Arnold, J.E.M. (2009) ‘Tree components in farming systems,’ Unasylva, 41(160), 35–42.

Aguilar, L., Araujo, A., & Quesada-Aguilar, A. (2010). Gender and climate change. The World Conservation Unit.

Borras J, Ian S, and David H (2011) small scale farmers in increasingly at risk from global land. The Guardian. Co. UK: poverty matters blog London.

Borras, S.M and Franco, M.J (2010). Towards a broader view of the politics of global land Grab: Rethinging Land issues, Reframing Resistance, ICAS Working Paper Series no.001.

Chukwudi, "Ogoni and Rivers’ politics of land acquisition". Punch. 10 June 2012.

Cotula.L, Dyer, N. and Vermeulen, S. (2009) Fueling expansion: the biofuels boom and poor people’s access to land. Rome: FAO/IIED.

Cotula, L. (2011) ‘Land deals in Africa: What is in the contracts?, London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).

FAO (2009). Towards Voluntary Guidelines on Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land and Other Natural Resources.Rome: Land Tenure and Management Unit (NRLA), FAO.

Gordillo, G and Platteau, J. P. (2000). Access to land, rural poverty and public action, UN – Wider Studies in Developments Economics Series. New York: Oxford University Press.

GRAIN. (2008). Seized: Seized: The 2008 landgrab for food and financial security

GRAIN (2012) World bank report on land grabbing: Beyond the smoke and mirror.

Grassroot International (2010). What is Landgrab?.

International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2008). ‘Improving accessto land and tenure security,’ IFAD: Rome.

Ofuoku, A.U and Ebewore, S.O. (2012). Effect of settlement patterns on cassava production in Delta State Nigeria. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: Agriculture and Biology, 12 (3), 12 – 17.

Oxfam (2010) what is land grab. Oxfam Research. www.OXFAM.CA/LAND.

Saka, J. O. and Lawal, B. O. (2009). Determinants of adoption and productivity of improved rice varieties in southwestern Nigeria

Thomas and Markus. 2012. Losing Ground: Forced Evictions and Intimidation in Cambodia. N.p.: Phnom Penh. Web.

Wilkinson, J. and Rocha, R. (2009). Agro-industry trends, patterns and development impacts. In da Silva, C., Baker, D., Shepherd, A.W., Jenane, C. and Miranda-da-Cruz, S. (eds.), Agroindustries for Development, Wallingford, UK: CABI for FAO and UNIDO, pp. 46-91.

Wilkinson, J. and Herrera, S. (2010). Biofuels in Brazil: debates and impacts. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37 (4), 749-768.

World Bank (2010) ” Rising global interest in farmland. Washington, D.C World Bank.

World Bank, (2010) Rising global interest in farmland, Washington DC: World Bank.

Zoomers, A. (2010). Globalisation and the foreignisation of space: seven processes driving the current global land grab. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(2); 429–447.